Trump plans to send $ 8 billion in the arms of Israel, exceeding law makers

The Department of State gave official notice of Congress to plan further by more than $ 8 billion weapons in Israel, exceeded the informal review process continued on the same house committee.
Just two days later after President Trump met Prime Minister Benjamin and Tanyafu in Israel, saying that “the United States will take” the Rivier East. ”
The Department of State was legally informed of Congress of its objectives on Thursday. That same day, Pentagon issued the release of the two stories, was sold in Israel 3000 fiery furniture cost $ 660 million, and the other said there were 6.75 kilometers. Pentagon did not issue the issuance of artillery shells, which as direct commercial sales does not require the department to remove a detailed statement. Together, all sales are more important than $ 8 billion.
Ben managers announced for sale of $ 8 billion early January, and submitting all international package and international relations details. In that process, lawless dealers may request the Department of Army detailed questions about selling before making a decision to not allow them.
The two Republican legal remains in Committees provide their approval, and eventually registered with Gregory Work, high democrat, determines the use of the review process to ask further questions.
The Department of State moved on the package after it was sitting in informal review of more than 20 days, the normal amount of the law provided for such cases.
Sales will probably continue in charge, because Congress will need to combine three housing votes to set the instructions.
After the announcement that the sale will move on despite holding, Mr.
“I continue to support the needs of the Israelite military armies as they face different difficulty,” Mr. Meeks in a statement. But his support, he made it clear, there was no limitations. He did what he described as a close consultation of “the administration management, lifting up the pile of anxiety – only for his questions, said, he, failed to supply text or reason.
Missing management to achieve sales were permitted to sell, but Mr Mr Mr said it had shown that “despondent negligence last time.”
Source link